Q: Is a website address that ends in .accountants a site you can trust or is it a fake?
A: In the early days of the internet there were only a few top level domains (for example: .gov, .ac, .com) but these soon got used up.
New top level domains have now been agreed, so you will see more of them. As well as .accountants you will see .book, .camera, .dental, .golf among many others. For a full list go to Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Internet_top-level_domains
Any site with these new domain names may be dubious for other reasons, but not because of the domain name.
Source: Phil Bradley in CILIP UPdate, March 2017
I was always making notes on scraps of paper about tips and facts I'd read in books and magazines, seen on the Internet or on TV. So this is my paperless filing system for all those bits of information I want to access easily. (Please note: I live in the UK, so any financial or legal information relates only to the UK.)
Monday, 12 June 2017
Friday, 9 June 2017
Brexit and the Economy
Brexiters and Remainers both fail to grasp the challenges facing
Britain by Tom Kibasi
The deal to leave the EU will shape Britain for decades to come. Will we
confront our problems? Or attempt to muddle through (where both sides of the
Brexit divide are taking us). Britain needs fundamental changes but we must first openly acknowledge our problems.
Remain failed to understand the reality of daily life for many people
and communities in modern Britain or that the current economic model is not
working for many people. Free movement of labour enables the low skill, low
productivity, low wage economic model imposed on much of the country, which (combined
with the cultural and identity challenge of large-scale immigration) has created
such discontent. It is not progressive to fail to invest in skills in this
country, while plundering poor countries of nurses or doctors or carers and
then approaching immigration as if people were commodities to be bought up on
the open market.
Leave saw Brexit as a magical solution to all of Britain’s problems,
along with fake promises on the NHS and immigration, and still argues we can
enjoy all the benefits of membership, such as frictionless, tariff-free access
to the single market, without any of the burdens. It has never mattered to them
that leaving the EU will make it harder to confront Britain’s economic and
social problems.
The Chancellor still focuses on top-line numbers, ignoring multiple
symptoms of a distressed economy that stretch back for decades. Our national
economic policy needs to be pro-growth and pro-economic justice.
Investment drives wealth and prosperity, but as a proportion of the
economy has been declining for 25 years, lagging behind comparable countries in
the west, and miles behind fast-growing economies in the east. People expect
that that business will invest in order to create good quality jobs, but investment
needs political stability and unfettered access to the single market of 500
million people, and Brexit undermines both.
Issues
Cheap and plentiful EU workers led firms to add more low cost jobs instead
of investing in plant, machinery or new forms of automation to drive up
productivity. Some businesses prefer to return more cash to shareholders than
to invest. British companies have become net savers rather than borrowers.
Low investment leads to low productivity, and then to low wages. Since
the financial crisis, the British economy has stalled, leading to stagnation in
living standards for the majority of households.
We have a massive trade deficit. If countries are keen for a free trade
deal with Britain (a debatable point) it is because we’re an importer, not an
exporter. The import/export difference is now 6%, financed by expanding debt
and selling off British assets.
Household inequality is high. The incomes of the richest 10% of
households are 11 times those of the poorest 10%; in France and Germany, the
difference is seven-fold, and in Denmark it is five-fold. Over time this
creates an enormous gap in wealth as well as income.
Our economy is profoundly regionally imbalanced. London is the
wealthiest region in Europe and, with the south-east of England, accounts for
40% of national output. All other UK regions lag behind most other regions of
northern Europe, and have below average productivity.
These problems are all of long standing, and not temporary weaknesses
in an otherwise sound model, showing that fundamental reform of the British
economy is needed.
We need to prepare ourselves for a decade of disruption, as changes
have the potential to reshape our economy and society – for good or for ill,
depending on the quality of our response.
During the referendum campaign, Remain made no attempt to show why and
how it might be easier to confront the challenges in partnership with our
neighbours than alone, how Britain has shaped the EU, or how we might better
influence its future. With better leadership, the EU might have been
transformed into a safe harbour in an era of profound challenges from
globalisation.
Drivers of change
Exponential improvements in new technologies, accelerating computing
power, machine learning and artificial intelligence, automation and the
“internet of things” have extraordinary power to utterly reshape how we live
and work, to reorganise our social, economic and political institutions and to redistribute
power and reward in society. Without deliberate policy, technological change is
likely to increase the share of rewards to those who have capital, whilst
diminishing the rewards that go to workers for their labour. Moreover, the
rewards for the highly skilled will continue to accelerate whilst diminishing
for everyone else.
Demographics. The UK population is set to become Europe’s biggest
country, with more people than France by 2030, and more than Germany by 2040.
At the same time it will age significantly, with a 66% increase in those over
the age of 75, bringing huge challenges in housing, health and social care. By 2030,
the working age population will grow by just 3%, but those over 65 will
increase by one third.
Economic power continues to shift eastwards. By 2030, emerging
economies will account for half of global output, up from a quarter today.
Nearly 60% of global middle-class consumption will come from Asia, and 17 of
the top 50 cities by GDP will be in China. The shape of global institutions is
likely to shift considerably.
Human activity is the dominating influence on nature consuming resources
at 1.5 times the ability of the earth to replenish them. A radical economic
response is needed in the coming decades to mitigate and reverse environmental
damage. The transition towards a low-carbon world is crucial to the vision of
an economy fit for the future.
Do we embrace greater international co-operation? As capital flows and
firms operate across borders, so there will be a greater premium on nation
states working together in the future. That positive case for the EU was never
really put to voters, and Brexit makes this path significantly harder.
If the fast pace of change means that it will be the ability to respond
rapidly and flexibly to change that will matter, then Britain might be better placed
to prosper outside the clunky framework of European regulations and
institutions.
The IPPR Commission on Economic Justice
The IPPR Commission on Economic Justice brings together leading figures
in British public life to address the persistent problems and ensure that
Britain is ready for the future challenges, with the goal of rewriting the
rules for the post-Brexit economy.
The politics of the future will belong to those leaders who are
prepared to face up to our present problems and future challenges and to
articulate a new destination for our economy and society.
Tom Kibasi is Director of the Institute for Public Policy Research and
Chair of the IPPR Commission on Economic Justice
Source: Brexiters and Remainers both fail to grasp the challenges
facing Britain by Tom Kibasi, in The Guardian, 11 March 2017
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/mar/11/brexit-kibasi-ippr-article-50-referendum-remain-leave
Labels:
Economics,
EU,
UK Politics
Monday, 5 June 2017
Credit and Debit Card Safety
We rely so much on our credit and debit cards these days, and there are always fraudsters trying to get hold of our details. Here are some tips.
Expired credit and debit cards. The stripe on the back of your card contains all your important personal data. Demagnetising your card will help make it unusable. Run a magnet along the magnetic stripe (the dark stripe along the top of the back of the card), then cut up or shred your card, making sure to destroy the chip (the silvery square section shows on the front and back of the card).
Sources: Various
Expired credit and debit cards. The stripe on the back of your card contains all your important personal data. Demagnetising your card will help make it unusable. Run a magnet along the magnetic stripe (the dark stripe along the top of the back of the card), then cut up or shred your card, making sure to destroy the chip (the silvery square section shows on the front and back of the card).
Sources: Various
Labels:
Card Crime
Saturday, 3 June 2017
My UK Elections Wish List - April 2017
Initially compiled April 2017 and updated June 2017
Economy
Military (usually euphemistically called defence)
Original post 7th October 2015
Economy
- "Trickle-down wealth" does not happen above a certain level of income. The very rich almost always invest money in various ways (e.g. trust funds, overseas accounts, exploiting tax loopholes, etc.) to keep it within the family. As this money is not spent in the UK, it does not help economic recovery. Tax rates for the wealthy therefore need to be fairly high.
- Minimum wage needs to be revised regularly and be sensible.
- Zero hours contracts may help businesses over less bouyant periods but mean that employees cannot count on any or specific hours being worked in a week/month.
- It does not appear that the banking sector is yet adequately controlled.
- There should be a legal requirement for schools to provide a library, suitable for their pupil age range.
- There should be a legal requirement for school music services to provide music tuition.
- The school curriculum should include citizenship as a compulsory subject.
- Provide a new 'school leaver certificate' with employer input, that focuses on an adequate level of written and spoken English, arithmetic, creating CVs, social interaction with customers, basic hygiene and nutrition, civic knowledge, etc. (This would help those who lack the ability to pass GCSE and A level's at specific levels, even with several resits - resulting in demoralization).
- Grammar schools do not facilitate social mobility and should be phased out.
- Set a 20mph limit in all towns and urban areas.
- Retain the ban on hunting.
- Require labelling on electrical goods to indicate its environmental impact.
- Require the setting up of recycling units for items currently difficult for the population to dispose of other than in landfill (e.g. some plastics, CDs, DVDs, tetrapacks). All plastic items must indicate the materials they are made of.
- All packaging should be recyclable if at all possible.
- See the Zero Waste Alliance 10 point plan.
- Organise medical waste collection separately (nappies, sanitary products, incontinence products, etc). It may be necessary to make some charge for this.
- There should be more focus on healthy living programmes to address issues (such as obesity, smoking, eating disorders, alcoholism and drug dependency) before they develop.
- Food labelling: the traffic light code should be made compulsory. Ingredients should be in larger print. Low sugar and low salt products should be promoted.
- Move the dietary advice strategy from 'low-fat' to 'low-sugar' (specifically fructose). Food labelling should split the sugar content into glucose and fructose. In 1945 just 25% of our sugar intake was in the foods we consumed; now 75% is already in food. The 'eating fat will make you fat' theory was based on erroneous interpretation of data.
- Bring in legislation that will curb the influence of the food and drinks industry on health policies. By not making salt and sugar reduction compulsory we have not made the progress we might have made. The legislation on advertising of food and drink could also do with a review.
- The above policies will also help to reduce pressure on the NHS, currently attempting to treat many problems due to an ageing population with an unhealthy lifestyle and too little exercise.
- In 1994, 75% to 80% of prisoners were under 30, from broken homes, poorly educated and often in for drink, drugs and car related offences.
- If sentenced for drink or drug dependency related offences, they should initially be treated for the dependency in specialist units, before completing sentences in prison.
- If in for less than 24 months, they should have intensive education in basic hygiene, civic values, basic literacy and numeracy, and cooking skills. Dependent on the length of sentence, they should also follow a course of training in one or more skills that would help them find jobs on release.
- Copy new 2016 French law that bans throwing away in-date retail and supermarket food waste; shops must give food away to charities or for use as animal feed, with heavy fines and even jail sentences to back up legislation. Italy has a similar law. [While the nine major uk supermarkets do donate unsold food to local food banks and charities, the proportion still thrown away is not published. Approvedfoods.co.uk sells food on or approaching its best before date at a discount.]
- Product packaging needs to be more recyclable.
- Educational strategies are needed to encourage people to use less energy and to recycle more.
- Implement the findings of the Leveson Report in full.
- All broadcasters and newspapers should be impartial and check facts fully. Media owners should not be able to use a media product to promote a particular political viewpoint.
- UK print press and broadcast media must be legally required to be neutral during UK local and national election periods.
- Move to Single Transferable Vote for elections to Westminster Parliament (and local councils / unitary authorities)
- Stop the heckling - Parliament looks worse than a school classroom on a bad day.
- Put a stop to philibustering (talking an opponents bill out of time).
- Reform the way private members bills are dealt with.
- Restrict the amount of advertising (press, broadcasting, house-to-house deliveries) each party is allowed during the election period, and in between elections.
- Restrict the amount anyone can give per year to a political party. Or stop it altogether and allocate public funds by proportion of total votes cast in previous election?
- MPs cannot have other employment during their terms of office.
- Ex-MPs should be restricted in the jobs they take on after leaving - e.g. not working as lobbyists for at least (5?) years.
- Move to proportional representation - some people's views are never heard or taken into account.
- Cannot accept paid adverts from political parties or candidates.
- Any feature or editorial on the election (irrespective of political party) must be treated the same throughout an election period. E.g. all such material is always on the recto (or the verso) side.
- All facts regarding statements by or about political parties must be verified to avoid misleading language or inaccurate facts.
Military (usually euphemistically called defence)
- Get rid of all nuclear arms (e.g. Trident)
- Cut down the arms industry, and gradually reduce the amount of arms sold to other countries.
- Reduce the armed forces. We should be training a competent emergencies response force instead.
- Revoke Article 50 and Brexit - we need to be in Europe.
- Find better ways of sending aid to less advantaged countries, so that funds and equipment do not end up in the hands of corrupt regimes.
- Support projects and agencies that focus on issues including (but not limited to) educating women, family planning, raising marriage age and restricting the dowry system so that it does not impoverish families, eliminating female genital mutilation and female infanticide, challenging perceptions around rape and spousal abuse, and ensuring women have the same legal rights as men.
- We have made distastrous decisions attempting to influence politics overseas in recent history and should stop this and concentrate on providing humanitarian aid - including acceptance of refugees.
Original post 7th October 2015
Labels:
Ethics,
UK Politics,
Voting Systems
Friday, 2 June 2017
UK Housing Market
UK’s housing market is broken, and only a radical solution can fix it
by Peter Hetherington
Rising land values should fund councils to build affordable homes
rather than fuel developers’ profits.
Britain for the past three decades, relative to population size, has
built fewer houses than any other western European country. In January 2017 a
white paper showed that just 140,660 homes in England were completed in the
year to December, a 1% fall on 2015. It also revealed that housing associations,
the main providers of homes classed as “affordable”, built a fifth fewer homes
in 12 months, due to Conservative policies that forced them to cut rents and
sell off valuable housing stock.
Continuation of the right-to-buy policy, pioneered by the Thatcher
government in the early 1980s, is not an incentive to build for the neediest –
if a new breed of council-owned housing companies will be subject to enforced
sales of new homes.
It seems the focus has now shifted from blaming councils for delaying
plans, through a cumbersome planning system, to blaming builders and developers
for sitting on large land banks once planning permission has been granted.
When around 270,000 homes are annually given planning permission, why are
only half that number being built? Two years ago an independent commission,
reported that six firms of land agents alone were holding strategic land banks
of 23,000 acres and warned that owners were holding onto land, sometimes with
planning permission, in the hope that it would rise in value. Why is so much
tied up in opaque agreements between owners and developers? Is an artificial
scarcity of land distorting the housing market and limiting building?
“Ministers, implicitly critical of the building industry, have floated
the idea of giving powers to the Land Registry, which logs house transactions
and – ostensibly – ownership of land, to try to uncover the scale of the
problem. There is even a strong hint that the public sector – councils and
government agencies – rather than developers should get the financial benefit
from an uplift in land value once planning permission is granted. If that
sounds radical, it is a model that funds housing, and infrastructure, in many
other countries. That alone might go some way towards fixing a broken market –
if it ever happens. We shall see.”
Source: UK’s housing market is broken, and only a radical solution can fix it by Peter Hetherington in The Guardian, 28 February 2017
Labels:
Housing
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)