Showing posts with label Immigration. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Immigration. Show all posts

Sunday, 12 April 2020

We Don't Need You Anymore: the Myth of UK Integration

We Don't Need You Anymore: the Myth of UK Integration by Kailash Puri with Bob Whittington. Whittles Publishing Limited, 2012.

In her 80s when she wrote this book, she drew on her own experiences as an immigrant to the UK and an agony aunt to successive generations and different nationalities in India, Africa, the USA and the UK. The book focuses on the Indian population, but the issues apply equally to Pakistani, Chinese, Arab, Polish, Bulgarian, Turk, Kurd or any other ethnic group who come to the UK.

Migration has always been the way the world has been settled by humans. Britain was first settled after the Ice Age, and further population groups have settled here in the years since. Equally, the British have been emigrants and settled in other countries - America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, India, Africa.

In the 1950s Britain was short of people to work in the factories and foundries, and both Asians and Caribbeans were recruited. Initially it was young men, wanting to earn enough to send home to families. They brought with them their own languages, religions and cultures, and later began families here with wives from 'back home'. For any immigrant, of whatever background, it is normal to interact with people who share your life experience, so immigrants tend to cluster together. As the ratio of immigrant to 'native' increases, areas become single community instead of mixed. As more generations are born, there are tensions between the old ways and new freedoms, and judging the host nation as deficient in morals, standards and discipline, simply because they are different.

The book goes into some detail about Asian, particularly Indian life, and how it differs from British. Asians are by nature hospitable, and believe it is lucky to invite guests into their homes. Indian society is based on family and tradition. The honour of the family is paramount, so divorce brings shame, as does marrying out of the community, or unmarried pregnancy. Family structure is still multi-generational and businesses are also linked to the family. Businesses run by Indians are most often serving their own community. This means that close family are often preferred marriage partners (though this has resulted in inbreeding and a higher proportion of genetic disorders). There is an expectation by parents that daughters and daughters-in-law will be submissive, though this can result in some (not all) being treated as servants. The focus is on sons, and they are often indulged, as there is the expectation that they will look after the parents in their old age. It is common for Asian men have one standard for themselves, and subject their wives to suspicion, jealousy and violent behaviour. For Indian parents, the challenge is to learn to let go.

Arranged marriages are the norm still, though some parents allow the son or daughter to refuse a potential partner. There are issues over the dowry system, and crimes associated with it. In India, evermore extravagant wedding celebrations can go on for days, in a bid to impress. If both partners to an arranged marriage are happy with the situation, their relationship can grow. Both arranged and non-arranged marriages can be a disaster.

"Britain has its own traditional values and it should be proud of them and resist changes to these traditions, particularly when they are attacked for being non-inclusive for people of a different origin. They are British traditions and if immigrants do not like them, they should not seek to persuade a government to change them so the country becomes all things to all men."

Both sides must show a willingness to find a way to co-exist, and that has to be through education. Where schools are truly mixed, immigrant children often develop a dual persona - home and school. But if the immigrant community is large enough, they may be the majority ethnicity in a school. Typically British schools follow a standard curriculum, and faith studies are comparative. But encouraging faith schools to stand alone and promote themselves as different leads to deeper division and not integration. Governments must root out extreme views and divisive teaching, and ensure that teaching does not promote some cause.
  • Racism comes from the fear of the unknown, whether food, dress, music, or customs.
  • Culture is not 'pure' and unchanging. Some change is consensual and some can be forced on people.
  • Traditions are just that, a repeated ritual and all evolve over time.
  • Language - having a language in common helps understanding, but some natives command of English can be poor.
  • Religion - the only certainty is that we all die and no-one knows what happens after death. Faith at its best provides moral guidelines for a just society.
  • Education - humans are naturally inquisitive.
  • Commerce - for many people, the acquisition of wealth becomes paramount. Asians are prone to this.
  • Isolation - you can be alone at home, or in a crowded room, town or country.
  • Envy - put envy and greed together and you get anger.
So how can we foster integration?
  • Don't deliberately try to integrate. Accept distinctions and different dress, but accept British rules and laws. 
  • All peoples eventually adapt and evolve and the following will happen: incomers will (a) conform, (b) leave or (c) influence their hosts in customs and traditions.
  • Explore and enjoy the difference. Some incomers may choose British clothing styles, while some natives may choose to follow another religion, or even none.
  • Some immigrants come to abuse and milk the welfare system, and they should be dealt with swiftly and forcefully.
  • There is no point in apportioning blame as the damage has already been done, instead focus on recovery.
  • Share where possible. Music and the arts are good areas for this.
  • Accept it will take time and effort on both sides.
  • Stop thinking about each other as groups, communities or races and start treating each other as individuals.
END

Monday, 12 March 2018

Perception Versus Fact

People's perception of facts is often wrong. News media focus on the bad news, with the result that we think things are worse than they really are. And if we allow the gloom to bring us down, it can affect our health. Remember that 5 positive, encouraging remarks are needed to offset the negative impact of just one piece of bad news.

In the UK

Murder: people think that the murder rate is getting higher or staying the same - wrong. In reality the murder rate is plunging and dropped by almost a third since 2000.

Terrorism: we think deaths from terrorism has got worse in the last 15 years - wrong. In fact they are significantly lower, down from over 300 to just 62.

Prisoners: people guess that 34% of prisoners are foreign born - wrong. The actual figure is 11.8% (much the same as the proportion of the overall population.)

Teenage pregnancy: people guess that 20% (or 1 in 5) babies are born to teenage mums - wrong. The real teenage pregnancy rate is 1.4% (just 1 in 70).

Diabetes: people think that about a quarter (25%) of British adults have diabetes - wrong. In fact the actual number is just 5% (5 in 100).

Vaccines: more than half of Britons are unsure or believe there is a link between vaccines and autism - wrong. The claim is widely discredited but only 45% of people know that it is false.

Health: people guess that only just over half of us are in good health - wrong. Actually the majority (75%) of Britons say their health is good or very good.

Technology: we estimate Facebook membership guessing that 74% of Britons aged 13+ have a Facebook account - wrong. In fact 58% are members.

Source: IPSO MORI Perils of Perception 2017 report

Saturday, 10 September 2016

Immigration

Brexiteers focused on figures published by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), which record net migration (a surplus of inward migrants) at 330,000.
  • This figure includes British nationals returning to the UK.
  • Many migrants do not settle in the UK; the reality is that people come and go.
Recently the ONS published an analysis of why, over the past five years, some 1.2 million non-nationals had applied for National Insurance (NI) numbers.
  • These are required for formal work and access to state benefits.
The difference between the two figures (330,000 and 1.2 million) is the result of short term migration to the UK; workers not settlers.

Immigration policy tends to focus in one of two ways.
  • The USA, Australia and Canada use 'objective' measures and points-based systems which prioritise skills, education and language ability.
  • States with less of an immigration history often give greater weight to cultural factors they believe will promote integration.
  • When formulating policy, governments test for material threats (affecting housing and schooling) and symbolic threats (cultural values and issues).
The Leave vote was highest in areas with fewer migrants.

The British public does not support the current restrictions on asylum.

Public opinion data records that British attitudes to migrants are shaped more by a sense of fairness than attitudes regarding race, nationality, skills or language. The British public do believe:
  • That benefits draw migrants to the UK.
  • That access to social rights should be conditional and not automatically available to EU citizens. (A 2008-9 ESS survey foudn almost 50% feel new arrivals should acquire the right to social benefits only after they have worked and paid taxes for at least a year.)

Source: Prof. Brad K.Blitz (a leading expert in migration studies) in pop-up newspaper The New European, issue 15-21 July 2016

There has always been some racism in the UK; it's almost impossible to find a country in which racism, at some level, does not exist. The suspicion of the outsider, the person who is not part ofyour group but may try to take it over, is deep inside all of us. We are more comfortable with those who are similar to us, and - whatever group we belong to - we tend to believe that our group is superior to others.

What we do with the differences is the key to racist beliefs and behaviour. Feeling that your group is best can tip into rating all others below you; in other words, you feel prejudiced against an entire group of individuals as a result of your sense of place in the world. This can be exacerbated by the sort of low esteem that may already have been growing in parts of the UK. Countering arguments are ignored as political correctness nonsense.

Even if you think you are not, you may well be a bit racist. The Implicit Association Test (bit.ly/1m808ph) was devised by a group of US universities, including Harvard, to measure the strength of associations between concepts (black people, gay people) and evaluations (good, bad) and stereotypes (athletic, clumsy). Take it some time - you may be surprised at what it reveals of hidden, unconscious prejudices of all kinds,including race.

Source: Louise Chun in pop-up newspaper The New European, issue 15-21 July 2016